a picture of woman holding a mask

Title

(The legality of Art – The question of theater in light of casuistry) La légalité de l'art La question du théâtre au miroir de la casuistique

Size

342 pages

Language

French

Released

October, 2020

ISBN

9782204141963

Published by

Les éditions du Cerf

See Book Availability at Library

La légalité de l'art

Japanese Page

view japanese page

It is well known and studied that Christian institutions attempted, for a long time and with insistence, to banish the secular theater, stigmatizing it in the name of—among others—a “school of vices.” In contrast, much less known is the way in which the same institution came to allow us to enjoy it without fear of facing the menace of “peccatum mortale.” In fact, the crucial turn occurred in the early modern era—namely, during the 16th-17th centuries—in a branch of Christian literature itself: morale theology or, as it is known in more specialized terms, casuistry. This book will then try to focus on this discursive practice, which today’s scholarship recognizes as a prototype of the modern “applied ethics,” while not yet fully exploring it, with the aim of observing how the casuists of the epoque—in particular, those who were sometimes criticized because of their “hypocrisy”—invented some arguments, apparently mocking or sarcastic in nature, to “legalize” the secular theatrical arts.
 
Along the way, the reader will encounter a number of strange and, eventually, more or less impudent “cases”: questions of whether it is permissible to condemn a heretic actor playing a heretic person; the acute controversy regarding “fictus” (id est [literally, “feinted person”]) in sacramental rites; a dialogue between a pope and an actor begging him for clemency; a labyrinthine examination of the pleasure one secretly enjoys while imagining criminal acts or watching them enacted on stage; and so on.
 
As to the rediscovery of ancient cooking recipes, so to speak, I intend to restore these forgotten arguments, which we recycle—even if only in a surreptitious way—to defend the very famous “freedom of expression.” Finally, the focus is not on giving any definitive conclusion but, rather, via negativa, on reopening the question, now apparently obsolete, which remains no less troubling: “We still applaud art, but why?”
 

(Written by MORIMOTO Yosuke, Associate Professor, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences / 2022)

Related Info

Related Article:
Tetsuya SHIOKAWA (Académie du Japon)  (LITTERA vol.7, p.127-131  2022)
https://doi.org/10.20634/littera.7.0_127

Try these read-alike books: