EVENTS

印刷

第72回STIG PoPセミナー/ Effectiveness and Efficacy of R&D Subsidies: Estimating Treatment Effects with One-sided Noncompliance

掲載日:2019年1月24日

基本情報

区分 講演会等
対象者 社会人・一般 / 在学生 / 受験生 / 留学生 / 卒業生 / 企業 / 大学生 / 教職員
開催日(開催期間) 2019年2月1日 16時 — 18時
開催場所 本郷地区
会場 工学部3号館 ラウンジ講義室211
定員 40名
参加費 無料
申込方法 要事前申込
お申込みは、こちらの登録フォームから
お問い合わせ先 問い合わせ先:STIG教育プログラム事務局
STIG@pp.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Effectiveness and Efficacy of R&D Subsidies: Estimating Treatment Effects with One-sided Noncompliance
(研究開発助成の効率性と有効性についての検証)

In evaluating the effectiveness of R&D subsidies, the literature so far has completely neglected the possibility of misappropriation of public funds. This paper contributes to the literature by evaluating the causal effect of R&D subsidies on R&D expenditures when monitoring is weak and misappropriation takes place due to moral hazard behavior. Our analysis is based on Chinese firm-level data for the period 2001-2011. Misappropriation is a major concern as we calculate that 42% of grantees misused R&D subsidies, corresponding to 53% of the total amount of R&D subsidies. In a setting with one-sided noncompliance to funding contract rules, we differentiate between the intention-to-treat (ITT) effect and the complier average causal effect (CACE). The ITT shows how effective the R&D policy was in practice when misappropriation exists. The CACE, in contrast, depicts how effective the policy could have been without misappropriation and thus is a measure for the efficacy of the R&D subsidy policy. Combining entropy balancing and IV methods to estimate both ITT and CACE, the ITT results show mild partial crowding out of R&D expenditures. Most strikingly, however, the CACE turns out to be more than twice as large as the ITT and confirms additionality of R&D subsidies. Thus, misappropriation of R&D subsidies considerably undermines the efficacy of Chinese R&D programs.

言語:英語

関連リンク

アクセス・キャンパスマップ
閉じる
柏キャンパス
閉じる
本郷キャンパス
閉じる
駒場キャンパス
閉じる